| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
41. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
i do like that sov defenders aren't allowed to use force multipliers but god forbid attackers lose their ability to use force multipliers
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.12 00:39:27
|
42. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: alternatively just hard lock all ships to minimum 3s align except pod and shuttle look at how easy it is to fix eve Or, keep it like it is, so that gatecamps don't grant safety and allow you to ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.12 00:27:39
|
43. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Scatim Helicon wrote: Kristian Hackett wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: We do not intend to allow pure evasion tactics to become optimal. Then make it disable prop mods on a ship activating it. Ev...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.11 23:00:02
|
44. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
alternatively just hard lock all ships to minimum 3s align except pod and shuttle look at how easy it is to fix eve
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.11 22:59:08
|
45. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Zappity wrote: baltec1 wrote: This is why people with zero experience with sov warfare should not be in this thread. This is wrong. The fact that you do not find the current, broken sov system interesting and worth getting invested in s...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.11 21:50:04
|
46. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: baltec is our fitting expert? You have several fleet fits named after the guy, sorry if I assumed too much, perhaps you have some others that might want to step up to the plate? yeah our megath...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.11 21:35:15
|
47. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: The TMC guest sov expert xttz contradicted himself within 2 posts, the CFC's fitting expert baltec got wrecked in a discussion about how trollceptors are going to outrun ships that are doing twice the speed of them... Seems exp...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.11 21:27:07
|
48. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lena Lazair wrote: baltec1 wrote: This is why people with zero experience with sov warfare should not be in this thread. I'm on board with this, if it also goes both ways and no CFC member can ever post in a lowsec, FW, highsec mission...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.11 21:21:31
|
49. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mike Azariah wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: technically an ishtar fleet doesn't require its members to push F1 because drone assist still exists You're welcome m uh we want drone assist to be completely removed you may notice that ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.11 20:21:49
|
50. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: baltec1 wrote: Eli Apol wrote: baltec1 wrote: So how do you plan to grab said trollcepter with a web when it is both faster than you by a large margin and has range on you? When defending your own structure one would ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.11 19:34:07
|
51. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: baltec1 wrote: This is why people with zero experience with sov warfare should not be in this thread. Supercap owners only? you can contest sov without using supercaps in the current system we do it with torpedo bombers ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.11 18:25:59
|
52. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: 1. We run them down and catch them on the open field just as easily. 2. Combat probes mean you can get pretty damn close on demand - which isn't a mechanic we can abuse in FW due to deadspace. Look, in lowsec we don't have t...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.11 18:18:18
|
53. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: Try talking to folks who actually have to deal with similar mechanics today - i.e. FW pilots - and you'll get a bazillion ideas on how to leverage the defensive advantages you have. fyi fw folks can catch interceptors becau...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.11 17:53:36
|
54. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Dras Malar wrote: If you don't have sov, and you've never had sov, and you have no intention of having sov, or finding out what it means to get it or keep it, what are you even doing in this thread? I was never interested i...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.10 14:07:15
|
55. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Carniflex wrote: If I would want to harass deep null systems I would personally pick something more suitable than a interceptor for that. A recon ship or T3, flex my cyno net and blops alts. Bring some friends along for the ride capable of kil...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.10 14:00:59
|
56. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
SoulLess Zealot wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: lookit this guy with orbit beacons for LP and FW missions trying to claim the carebear angle Lol in four posts you havent added anything relevant to the conversation aaand complaining a...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.10 13:49:57
|
57. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
SoulLess Zealot wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: SoulLess Zealot wrote: First off not everyone has j/f alts bud .. how personal jf alts are like a basic requirement to actually be a person in this game Well i guess when you live i...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.10 13:44:51
|
58. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
it is like you are incapable of thought actually considering your opinions on sov i guess this is a non-surprise in retrospect
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.10 13:43:01
|
59. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
also if you are that destitute after engaging in fw missions, just drop fw and duckwalk out of lowsec with your stuff
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.10 13:42:14
|
60. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
SoulLess Zealot wrote: First off not everyone has j/f alts bud .. how personal jf alts are like a basic requirement to actually be a person in this game
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.10 13:40:51
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |